<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>De Rerum Natura &#187; Multiple Choice Questions Exam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corrada.com/blog/tag/multiple-choice-questions-exam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corrada.com/blog</link>
	<description>Randomness, entropy, pattern matching, maps, geometry, knots, and scientific readings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Not every measurement is perfect</title>
		<link>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/13/not-every-measurement-is-perfect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/13/not-every-measurement-is-perfect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrés</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multiple Choice Questions Exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision error application]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corrada.com/blog/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Just to show that not all questions behave as nicely as question 9 in the previous post, here is the plot for question 6 in the same exam.The fit is not as good as for question 9. This is expected, there is no reason why the precision error should decay with a perfect exponential behavior. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/13/not-every-measurement-is-perfect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum number of questions revisited</title>
		<link>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/11/minimum-number-of-questions-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/11/minimum-number-of-questions-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrés</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Randomness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiple Choice Questions Exam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corrada.com/blog/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To show off the installation of FancyZoom (a trick I learned while visiting the excellent Language Log), I present a graph of the percentage variation in the mean square precision error as a function of the number of questions used to compute it. The image looks small but you can now click on it to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.corrada.com/blog/2008/04/11/minimum-number-of-questions-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
